[3] Like a film maker, a Sound Artist, or at least some of us, becomes hyper aware of the sounds or the world around us. I have always been very interested in sound, always aware of the sound in things like movies, TV... the sounds around us and how it changes the mood or feeling of a situation.
[4] I love finding pre-existing sounds, either things I field record myself or take from various sources, and juxtaposing them, altering them, re-using them in different ways... inventing implied narratives and sort of... films without images, where each listener has a different idea of what they are hearing.
[5] I grew up poor and strange. The other kids, in their brutal youthful honesty and social hierarchy, did not take much interest in me. This forced me occupy myself and find where exactly I did fit. Over time, awareness of the sounds around me, the sounds within me, and the sounds I imagined, all helped me find my own sense of self and place.
[6] The obvious tensions between classical systems of musical notation and composition, sound-sourced field-recordings, free-improvised-real-time-composition, and technology based sound processing makes me glad I never went to conservatory to study more formal approaches to music.
[7] For me, composition is more like writing a screenplay... and editing is where I spend most of my energy, honing and sculpting the finished work... which is never totally finished because I endlessly revisit works and combine elements of past compositions into new constructs.
[8] The main theoretical aporia, existential tension or trigger that keeps me producing and/or made me produce (and/or: writing about) sounds is …………..………
[9] The immense scope and variety of musical inventions forced into canonized music history and its basic distinction of music and non-music in the XX.Century (say) since “Arnold Schoenberg” and the counter-explosions of new underground music paradigms, non-europeans traditions and playing techniques since the 1940’s …………..……
[10] Time, Space and Volume: Time x (Space + Volume) = Drone.
[11] A musical instrument can never be fully explored or its potential exhausted as long as technology exists to add new possibilities to its voice and interaction w/ others.
[12]The musical encounter of my dreams would be something I would spend many hours attempting to replicate after waking.
[13] The point zero ..……………………
[14] Sounds present invisible sculptures, and these sculptures will be perceived differently depending on where they are perceived, by whom they are heard, and by their relation to the space around them.
[15] Sounds(capes) should be allowed to exist and play with others. Sometimes they get a long very well, other times... not so well.
[16] Sounds and destruction are ………………………….
[17] The human voice ……………….. disappear ………
[18] Listening is more important than anything. If more people would simply quiet themselves and not be afraid of silence, they would realize there is never true silence (outside of anechoic chamber). That is not to say that the human voice should disappear. Just that if one sits and listens, they might learn a lot from the people they have been talking over all the time... and one might also realize that the timing belt on their car is shot.
[19] The commodity factor of monetizing one's work is something I am not very interested or good at. Perhaps if I were better at it, it might interest me more. But, I have never had much luck the times I have tried to 'get my stuff out there'... and it only made me feel crazy and alone. Additionally, I have no mind for social media and that end of things. I have grown over the years to simply make myself focus on the work itself, and focus on the tours I do to support the works ... and to leave it at that. Being on tour and having a chance to directly interact with and discuss things with audiences is the most satisfying part of creating things. As for commodity, I do like to make tour tshirts and whatnot to make the money for the fuel to get to the next show... but, is that commodity, branding, or just good business sense? I am not sure about any of that. I just think it is really cool when I see someone wearing one of the shirts I designed.
[20] Programs and algorithms and modifications can all wait until later. I like to just press record on my field recorder and deal with it later.
[21] Names, words and titles of compositions give the listening a suggestion of my intent or narrative for a piece, but ultimately they are just suggestions and whatever conclusion the listener comes to for themselves regarding a piece is equal to my own conclusions.
[22]Duplication, sampling, sound-sourcing and manipulation create an endless source of reworking ideas into ever flowing takes on what eventually become archetypical concepts within my work ... possibility, memory (and lack thereof)... works becoming the source of new works becoming the source of new works, until the original material is unbeknownst even to myself, never mind the participants at hand.
[23] Replay-Machines, architecture ……… the listening…….
[24] Knowledge can interfere with intuition if one is not careful. Thurston Moore once said that the worst thing he ever did was to really learn to play the guitar (he said something to that effect). At the same time, knowledge can help with the fluidity with which one can manifest ideas... I have been using the same live gear set-up for over a decade now, and the fact that I know exactly where everything is on the table and what every piece of it is capable of - that I can literally perform without even looking at the table if I want - means that instead of worrying about the physical aspects of performance, that I can immerse myself in the sound and be open the possibilities that each room, each night, each audience offers.
I always make a setlist of ideas which I plan to present at a show. But, over time this exercise has become more of a last ditch safety net or just a sort of vague suggestion on how a show might go... but, once the sounds starts to flow, I quickly stray very far from the original flowchart I had in mind.
[25] The materiality of sounds ………………………………
[26] To connect sound and psychology …………………
[27] The eye, the ear and the brain all work in conjunction when listening to music whether we realize it or not. Auditory information, such as sound and musical tones, are processed by our two temporal lobes. When lyrics are involved, our language centers and frontal lobe interpret the words and suggest their conveyed meaning. In these Drekka soundscapes, a narrative is constructed. If we use the musical narrative as a tabula rasa onto which we project our own characters or plot, we use our occipital lobe, ironically located in the back of our heads, away from our eyes, to imagine visuals of the narrative. The Drekka film soundscapes take advantage of our brains' capacities for imagination and invention. (guest answer by Drekka archivist, Andrew Eley)
[28] Sonic processes …………………… mimesis…….
[29]Life and Death should both include a healthy relationship with and appreciation of silence.
[30] My deepest ……………………………. audible……
[31] The distinction sound/music/noise is subjective, and to worry or focus on such distinctions is to create a constant underestimation of the potential for new ways of seeing and hearing the world and its people.
[32] The ……………. to a constant underestimation of …………
[33] Live performances is where I present to the audience my intention and my narrative; where my mind interfaces with those around me, inviting discourse, community, and tribe building. Live performances are also the genesis for most Drekka works, whether it is the performance itself that creates the song, or is a recording of a Drekka live performance that then becomes sampled, modified, and reorganized as a catalyst for a new and completely different Drekka song. Old, forgotten demo cassettes are rediscovered as found sounds and a source of inspiration for new tracks, sometimes decades later.
[34] Sounds travel from hand to hand, ear to ear, through space and time, with each interception bringing a new perspective for the receiver... even if received multiple times.
[35] …...…. 4’33” ………. a window …..……..
[36] Privacy, Secrecy & Sounds ……...
[37] Singularity, originality …………...… musical genres……...
[38] The total liberation of sounds is silence, and/or death.
[39] Free form music or sound …….. into …..
[40] Cryptic minimalisms …….. techno …..
[41] Outsider sounds belong to my tribe. We come before and linger long after.
[42]Electronics, electro-acoustic, Modular Synths …… interstellar …….
[43] Sounds …….…. time-space manipulations ……...
[44] The severest misconceptions about me and my sounds, my music, and my theories is that I am working towards commercial ends (mostly this misconception comes from my well meaning parents). While I would like nothing more than to have the luxury and priviledge of supporting myself financially from my works, I have always worked under the assumption that my ideas has no commercial potential.There are ways to make things fiscally viable, but that involved a drive and hustle that I do not have. I am pretty much solely interested in present moment interaction and communication of ideas.
[45] The sentence(s) I wanted to see published for an eternity is/are the ones signed "L.Cohen".
Cordial thanks, MKL,
for your contribution !
To visit the THE 45SIS page
on this blog
click here